QUI-GON JINN
  • MAR 04
Jamie Wire wrote: "If you all have been reading everything that has slipped out of Rick McCallums mouth, then you'll know that he has said the following, in the Star Wars magazine, (maybe it was even Liam Neeson himself): 

Neeson's character would have a shade of grey philosophy on the Force. That meaning he wouldn't view it from simply a Light versus Dark perspective. He is also a mature Jedi who looks after the younger knights. He is also second to Yoda in the chain of command. 

>>>The shade of grey thing is what gets me. This seems to say that  
>>>Gui Gon Jinn, (Qwee Yon Yenn as it's seemingly pronounced) 
>>>doesn't believe in using the Force from defence (light side) 
>>>or attack (dark side), and he will not compromise his beliefs, 
>>>yet he is an important Jedi. 

And from another unofficial source: Qui-Gon will have a hand in causing the rift between Anakin and Obi-Wan Kenobi, either directly or indirectly, perhaps convincing Obi Wan to train Anakin early. (TheForce.Net) 

>>>How does he cause the rift between Anakin and Obi Wan? 
>>>I think it will be because of his differing attitude to Obi Wan 
>>>in terms of the force. Anakin will perhaps see Jinn use it  
>>>differently and question Obi Wan. 
>>>I really can't speculate on this thing because I don't know. 

Another snippit. 

Anakin will have a best friend who turns out to be more evil than Darth Vader.  

>>>Anakin has an evil best friend. Could it be Qui Gon Jinn? 
>>>It's supposed to be his father, apparently confirmed by 
>>>Neeson last week.  

another bit: 

The character that is primarily responsible for the fall of the Republic will be one that we are very familiar with, yet won't be Vader or any other "dark" character. This character will ignore plainly visible signs, and will not heed their meanings due to his/her ideals. 

>>>Next bit. This means a central character, one with principles. 
>>>I don't think it will be Jar Jar, (nor Obi Wan, he just messes 
>>>it all up, he's not evil.)  Its not Anakin, or Palpatine.  
>>>That leaves, in theory, Padme or Qui Gon Jinn.  
>>>We know Qui Gon has strong ideals, namely his shade of grey 
>>>philosophy. BUT... Obi Wan says in ROTJ 
>>> 
>>>"my foolish pride had severe consequences from the galaxy"  
>>> 
>>>What does that mean? 
>>>Any fear of Ben Kenobi being culpable has to be disspelled 
>>>with this bit though.. 
>>>and another bit: 

In Episode III, the Jedi Council changes, the true source of evil is revealed, Luke and Leia are born, Palpatine becomes the Emperor and Obi-Wan "screws up everything for everyone."  
  
>>>The true source of evil? 
>>>this must be Qui Gon Jinn. 

Hmm... Comments please" 

Roderick wrote: "Two things: 
"Anakin will have a best friend who turns out to be more evil than Darth Vader" - this was just a vague rumor... 
"Anakin has an evil best friend. Could it be Qui Gon Jinn?It's supposed to be his father, apparently confirmed by Neeson last week." - Neeson didn't confirm this: read the prequel news at Jedinet to see how this rumor began... 
I just want to remind us all that we should be careful in quoting rumors. Remember the 'confession' of Deepthroat? Well, some of these rumors might be made up as well. Could anyone find the exact quotes of McCallum or other official quotes that support the above theory?"
Adam wrote another thing that concerns Qui-Gon: "I was always under the impression that yoda trained Obi-Wan.  "I thought I could train him (Anakin) as well as yoda trained me, I was wrong." 
         
Now all the web pages seem to be saying that Qui-Gon Jinn trains Obi-wan.  Did Lucas forget the Qbi-wan's line in ROTJ, are all the rumor mongers getting carried away, or am I just not remembering things correctly?  Maybe they (Qui-Gon Jinn and Yoda) train Obi-wan together, I dunno.  I'm interested in your opinions."
  • MAR 05
Jom wrote: "To Jamie: 

The quote: 

"The character that is primarily responsible for the fall of the Republic will be one that we are very familiar with, yet won't be Vader or any other "dark" character. This character will ignore plainly  visible signs, and will not heed their meanings due to his/her ideals".  (This came from Knowles site originally, I believe) 

This is obviously talking about Obi-wan.  I base this on the next two quotes: 

1) "my foolish pride had severe consequences from the galaxy"   

2)  "In Episode III, the Jedi Council changes, the true source of evil is revealed, Luke and Leia are born, Palpatine becomes the Emperor and Obi-Wan "screws up everything for everyone." 

The character "primarily responsible" for the fall doesn't have to be evil.  It won't be a "dark" character.  IMO, this is Ben."

Talorcan wrote: "I don't think Jamie Wire's "character primarily responsible for the fall of the old Republic" is Qui-Gon. There's no mention that this character is actually evil. In fact he is "not Vader or any other dark character"; he  just fails to act, or acts wrongly, because of his principles, and is "one we are very familiar with". Now the only possibilities here are Ben Kenobi, Yoda, Owen Lars and Bail Organa - I presume it means characters we are ALREADY familiar with from ANH, ESB, and ROTJ. I think the fault must lie with Obi-Wan. 

"I thought I could train him (Anakin) as well as yoda trained me. I was wrong.... My foolish pride had severe consequences from the galaxy." 

Obi-Wan's self-righteous idealism is what leads to Anakin's transformation into Vader. Without Vader, the Emperor could not have destroyed the Jedi. Without Vader, the Empire could not have been maintained. And it is Obi-Wan's fault. 

As to Qui-Gon, I think he's important as a mentor-figure (no-one takes Yoda seriously) but he isn't (apparently) important enough to be a member of the Jedi Council. Also, his "shades of grey" philosophy - for which read cynicism? - will probably reflect the more mature, less clear-cut, attitude of the Prequels. But he remains the most enigmatic figure among the heroes of the new trilogy."

Jamie Wire wrote: "more unfounded rumours: 

"" Coming Attrations has received a report that when Anakin wins the pod race, his prize is anything wants in Watto's junk shop, and Anakin chooses R2D2. Another child, Seek, teases and confronts Anakin  about R2D2, as he knows that they are poor and can't afford a droid (Seek doesn't know about the pod race win). Enraged, Anakin uses the Force to push Seek violently into a wall to Qui Gon's displeasure. This is where he tries to teach him about the nature of the Force, and not to be tempted by the darkside. Anakin takes little notice of Qui Gon, as Qui Gon-Jinn is his stepfather. Anakin claims that Qui Gon is not his father, and he does not respect him. That is why Anakin forms a close bond with Obi Wan later in the film.""  
 

>>this would seem to support the "father figure" role, but Anakin doesn't care for Qui Gon at all. Admittedly, it does flatten my theory about Qui Gon being evil (slightly) as obviously Anakin doesn't like Jinn. But I still stand by it."

Deepthroat wrote: "The rumor about Neeson's character being the cause of the rift bewteen Anakin and Ob-Wan was started by Truefan at Jedinet's website (it can be found way in the back of their prequel news archive).  I'm probably in the minority on this, but I believe the rumor to be false, and I don't believe that Truefan is the real thing.  Yes, he's been right about a lot of things, but then again so was I.  He's been more careful recently, but if you look at some of the scoops he was reporting last year, they have been blatantly contradicted.  He reported casting rumors for ep. 3 (Vader and Bail Organa) before ep. 1 casting was even announced, and I think recent comments by McCallum & Gurland seriously undermine him (common-sense:  would Lucas really be looking for the guy to wear the Vader suit (3 years hence) now ?  I know what you're thinking, but no, Truefan was talking about Vader, not older Anakin).  He also reported that Bail Organa was only a small role in ep. 3.  Adrian Dunbar's comments would seem to invalidate this as well.  Trufan also reported that filming would begin in September.  Around the same time he reported this, I wrote to Harry Knowles that filming would begin around June/July and end in September (another spy of Harry's had provided the September date earlier--I guessed (correctly) that it was the end date, to go along with my theory/hope that the film would be released in 1998, and I suppose that Truefan guessed it would be the start date, and guessed wrong).  I also recall that it was Jedinet which claimed that LFL had ordered them to remove "sensitive" prequel info from their site--specifically, it referred to dreadnaughts, Boba Fett as a young man, and Concord Dawn.  None of this strikes me as being particularly sensitive, and, other than the dreadnaughts, none of it strikes me as having the ring  of truth.  I really don't mean this to be a slam on Jedinet, Garindan, or Truefan himself (I'm certainly in no position to pass judgment), but since we're in the business of weeding out truth from falsehood, I think these points should be brought to light. 
  
While I'm at it, I finally found the original source of the "shade of gray" rumor about Qui-Gon which I've seen reprinted word-for-word on countless web sites.  It appeared in an anonymous post of 6/10/97 on Corona and included the suggestion that Neeson's character "influences Obi-Wan to train Anakin prematurely."  I must also point out that I described Neeson's character as "ambiguous" in a AICN post way back in April, no doubt contributing to the prevalence of this rumor.  
Also of note, the rumor about the airbus being "set upon by five or six black ships . . .with sweeping fins" first appeared on Corona on 2/16/97, as reported by a computer workstation salesman who got too see the film's opening sequence while making a sale (uh-huh). I also researched some of the Bothan Spy/Imperial Droid's old reports, considering that it's pretty certain he's the real deal, and found these bits--Qui-Gon is Anakin's father, and Anakin builds C3PO.  I would take this practically as confirmation of these rumors, but he also claimed, though, that Terence Stamp played an alien in a swamp sequence (maybe he was thinking of Brian Blessed?) and that Naboo was situated on Coruscant (highly unlikely).  Still, he was the one to break all the inside photos, the call sheets, the cast lists and character names, so who knows? I also wanted to bring another interesting old scoop to your attention, one that predated the first mention of Naboo by about 2 weeks.  Here it is, from AICN 9/22/97: 

"Meanwhile on the Prequel front I had a report come in from the worlds being created just moments from London in a magical village of imagination known as Leavesden. Once again I must call the validity of this report into question as this is a first time spy, who I will identify as Mr Skellington, a rather tall gaunt character that is known for his derring do. Mr  Skellington witnessed what were called the BADUO scenes. These scenes have some very definate spoiler situations, but know this. I have NO clue how this fits with what we know about the other stuff that other spies have told us. Once again read with a grain of salt, and as Lucas said on the Star Wars dot com site, don't believe anything till you see it on the screen. Good advice, I believe it. 

From these sequences Mr Skellington could tell that the young queen is a figure head with no real power you see the republic stands on alot of protocol, which in the long run dooms it. The jedi are on hand for her coronation twelve to be exact, all strong with the force but totally dependent upon the senate to direct them, this frustrates some of the younger jedi who crave adventure, they wish to join the growing battle that is taking place beyond the BADUO system a not so young senator (WHO WE ALL   KNOW) is trying to slyly force the jedi to use thier power to "right the wrongs of the present insurection" all should be fine what with the new leader (QUEEN) leading her subjects. One young jedi and main guard to th queen OBI-WAN who is at this point really just a diplomat who is "force sensitive" detects something amiss and makes it his mission to alert the powerful JEDI SKYWALKER that all is not well in BADUO.On his journey to tell the great warrior he is followed by Darth Maul and the dangerous sith coven. There were people from MATTEL in on the last day of our shoot, and they  seemed very excited." 

Badou, Naboo--easy to mix up.  This scoop would support a theory I've had for some time--that Palpatine is the senator from the queen's planet (think about it).  The scoop also seems to intimate that the film begins with the coronation on Naboo, which jibes with the most recent reliable reports from Cinescape.  The "Jedi Skywalker" would be Qui-Gon Jinn Skywalker.  I also believe this is one of he first mentions of Darth Maul, a name later confirmed by Bothan Spy/Imperial Droid.  If Skywalker is on Tatooine and Maul follows Kenobi, then it would follow that Maul follows Kenobi to Tatooine, and thus this rumor jibes with the Maul/Jinn duel photos on Tatooine.  Perhaps the invasion begins soon after Kenobi leaves, and Padme escapes later with Panaka and co. to catch up with Obi-Wan on Tatooine.  And maybe Obi-Wan gets sidetracked by Maul, and then meets up with the Jedi Council who escape to Coruscant.  And maybe . . .well, in any case, it's an interesting and overlooked scoop. 

Anyway, sorry about the length, but once I started combing the different site archives, I couldn't help myself.  Hope it was interesting!"

  • MAR 06
Jom wrote: "I have to respond to Deepthroat's post.  About Palpatine being the Senator from Naboo...I've came to the same conclusion awhile back also. But I used a different method.  Actually, it is a little more simple. Back in June rumors were that a coronation scene was being filmed in Italy.  At this shoot was Ian McDiarmid, who plays Palp.  Some people originally thought that it was Palp's coronation as Emperor that they were filming.  This theory was subsequently denied by GL at the press conference.  So why was Ian there?  Well, if he were the Naboo representative to the Republic he would probably attend the coronation of the Queen, would you think?  Pretty obvious when you think about it.  Plus, add in the rumor Deepthroat mentions and it seems pretty solid. 

Your whole post was great.  It reminded me of the many rumors that have been flying around for the past year.  I had forgotten about the "Badu" post a Harry's site.  Looking back now this is a SIGNIFICANT rumor.  You're post almost (but not quite) makes up for your past wrong-doings.   :  >  )

JEV wrote: "I think this subject brings on a very important question about episode 1:  
 Is Qui-Gon Jinn the father of Anakin? It seems a lot will interact with that notion. It will certainly have a big role to play concerning the relationship between Anakin and Obi-wan, espacially in it's beginning. 
About the shade of gray part, I'm uncertain, it seems to go against being "venerable" as he is suppose to be(GL said so). Is role in Anakin's downfall may not be as big as some think, espacially if he dies in the first as it as been speculate."
  • MAR 08
Gillespee wrote: "I am still wondering, if Jinn is a "gray" Jedi, why is he so highly placed in Jedi society?  And I still find it very hard to believe that any Jedi Knight, even a "gray" one, which I highly doubt he is, could abandon his son and wife.  That seems like a step dangerously close to the Dark Side.  In fact, I find it hard to believe such a Jedi could exist.  "Once down the dark paths you tread, forever will it dominate your destiny..."  Either one is all the way in the Light Side (BTW this is me talking, not anybody else, MY philosophy) or one is on the path towards being consumed by the Dark Side.  There is no in between.  I just can't fathom anyone placing their trust in a Jedi who abandons his wife and child on a harsh planet.  Whatever role he plays, I assume that at least in the first episode, it will be a big one. 
Perhaps some one more knowledgeable than I could make a checklist of rumors about Qui-Gon, when they were started, and by whom, and how many grains of salt we should take them with. *nudge, nudge Deepthroat*"
  • MAR 10
Gonk wrote: "All right, I feel I should say something on all of this. I don't see why the 'Shade of Grey' rumor should be false. In fact, except for the Emperor, I don't think we see ANYONE in the Trilogy who is completely all Light or Dark Side. Obi-Wan lies to Luke about his father, is the one who makes the fatal mistake about Anakin. Yoda tells Luke to forget about his friends, Luke turns to the Dark Side at the very end, albeit temporarily. And Vader....Geez, Vader just flip-flops back and forth, doesn't he? 

Perhaps the Neeson character, if he 'abandons' anyone, is in a very complicated situation. Say he was needed elsewhere, and left his family on Tatooine, where unbeknownst to him, they were sold into slavery. While this might make him out to be a Jedi of the Light Side, Lucas could also insert overtones that he's very independant, and doesn't want to be tied down-- sort of a selfish aspect if you've got a kid to think about. 

So, if you're a do-gooder that happens to be a rather negligent father, something that DOESN'T naturally come out of being a do-gooder, where does that put you in that scenario, Light or Dark? 

Of course, this is all simple speculation. Perhaps Qui-Gon is just an officially 'light' Jedi of a minority philosophy-- that the Dark Side's freedom should somehow be incorperated with the Light's static immobility. 
  
To Deepthroat, I would say that TrueFan appears legit enough-- if he's not in the know, he's made enough intelligent guesses to appear that he is, a method you adopted an one point, apparently. Also, I'm confused as to what the position towards Fake Spies like you should be. Take Harry, for example, who seems as ambiguous as Vader himself on this. On one hand, since the summer or so, he has been stating how exciting this is to play the 'rumor game' as Episode I comes to the fore. Yet only a full year ago, he had written a long editorial that looked in disfavor on Lucasfilm if they were running a 'disinformation campaign'. It's a 180 degree turnabout on a subject that has good points either way."

Jamie Wire wrote: "How can Kenobi be the evil when he is referred to elsewhere in the sentence below? It has to be a character that doesn't survive (or Vader) because Obi Wan just screws it all up. he cannot be the evil as i first said.! 

"In Episode III, the Jedi Council changes, the TRUE SOURCE OF EVIL is revealed, Luke and Leia are born, Palpatine becomes the Emperor and Obi-Wan "screws up everything for everyone."" 
  
This true source of evil if it is not deepthroats own fantasy once again has to be one of the main characters that we would not expect. Surprises are going to be low for us on these pages anyway. 

The "character that destroys the galaxy kind of" could be Ben. It might not be though. From the prequel FAQ 

The character that is primarily responsible for the fall of the Republic will be one that we are very familiar with, yet won't be Vader or any other "dark" character. This character will ignore plainly visible signs, and will not heed their meanings due to his/her ideals. 

This could mean one we are very familiar with from the first trilogy. Otherwise it is Kenobi. 

According to Corona's Coming Attractions, Neeson's character is is a mature Jedi, who has a "shade of grey" perspective of the force. This "grey" ability is not to be confused with a Dark Jedi, but this would seperate Neeson's Jedi from other Jedi who walk in the Light Side. Neeson may be the one who influences Obi-Wan to train Anakin prematurely. This would contribute a major factor to Anakin's fall into the Dark Side. 
 

A New Jedi Master (Neeson). The character will most likely be named Qui-Gon Jinn. Neeson will be playing the leader of the Jedi, trained by Yoda and comparable to "a good Emperor and Vader. Variety reports that Neeson's character is a master Jedi Knight and the main character in Episode I. Neeson will play a role much like the one Guinness played in Star Wars, a mentor for the young knights. Additional reports say that his character is "the leader of the troops." 

George Lucas said that he was looking for an actor who could portray nobility as well as calm and strength, and that Neeson was one of the few who could do it. 

In an Interview in the December 1997 Star Wars Insider, Neeson offered several bits of information about his character:  
- He is second in the Jedi pecking order next to Yoda. 
- He is involved in a lot of lightsaber fighting. 
- He does a lot of philosophizing and 'tries' to teach Anakin a code of ethics. 

gives a picture of this character, I suppose.

Christian wrote: "about this oh-so-weird name: Qui-Gon Jinn... could "Qui-Gon" be a Jedi rank? "Qui-Gon" Jinn Skywalker would make lots of sense. The same goes to "Obi-Wan". I've heard this speculation before, and it makes much more sense than the Ben-clone stuff. "Obi-Wan" could be a rank. Don't we have the "Darths", after all?"
  • MAR 16
Deepthroat wrote: "First, let me say that I believe there are very few prequel insiders whom I consider to be reliable--namely, the Bothan Spy/Imperial Droid, the Force.net's sources, and Chris Kivlehan's sources at Cinescape.  Roderick posted a very good account, under the "True Confessions" subject, which explains the different disciplines that Cinescape and Force.net use with regard to posting insider reports, versus those used by Harry Knowles, Corona and others.  As for the Bothan Spy, I simply feel that the enormous amount of genuine info he has provided, along with exclusive photos from inside Leavesden not seen anywhere else, prove that he is the real deal.  As for Truefan, in addition to what I have said before, which for me is enough to conclude that he is not a genuine spy, I should also point out that he has been (mistakenly) predicting that the title of Episode I would be announced as far back as July '97.  He later revised this to Dec. '97,  then to Jan '98, then to summer '98, and finally to late '98 after Lucas' own comments (in SW Insider) pointed to a fall '98 date for the release of a trailer.  I also was the originator (I think) of the rumor that the "Genesis" title was the development title of Ep. I.  Truefan later reported that this was the title under which the script was submitted for copyright.  I don't see why Lucas would need to attach any title other than eps. 1,2,&3 in order to gain copyright on a script.  

As a former "spy" myself, let me say that one of the few "tricks" of the trsde is to try to be as ambiguous as possible, basing what you say on reliable information and then adding a little bit of your own.  I honestly believe that the "gray" Qui-Gon rumors ultimately lead back to comments I made on Harry's sit in April '97, shortly after the Neeson casting was announced in Variety, where I called the character "ambiguous."  At the time, Harry was convinced (I think) that I was the real thing, and said as much many times on his site.  Others, taking me as real, would then extrapolate the "shade of gray" thing from my comments, and the whole rigamarole began.  As I said before, the "shade of gray" rumor came from anonymous scoops that are unconfirmable.  No reliable source, not any of the one's listed above, nor any of the interviews with Lucas, McCallum, Neeson, McGregor, et al. has given any indication at all that the "shade of gray" rumor has any truth to it.  The closest thing we have to that are Lucas commments in the Star Wars screen saver, which alludes to "betrayal among friends" and not knowing who the good guys and the bad guys really are.  This is what I based a lot of my rumors on, and I'm sure it has either directly or indirectly produced many of the other rumors floating around.  Of course, this is not to say that the rumor might not ultimately turn out to be true."

Gillespee wrote: "Well, first I mean to clarify a little.  I didn't not mean to say that any force user you encounter will be inherently dark or light, I meant 
that there is a spectrum, and people are constantly moving on it.  i.e. 
Towards the end of ROTJ, Vader is pretty dang dark.  Very low, but he 
changed his ways at the very end, and died a peaceful death, not a 
violent force explosion like the Emperor.  Perhaps where you are in the 
spectrum is decided by how fast you are moving.  Vader was moving fast, 
so he died happy and could join the Jedi "ghosts" at the celebrations 
(Remember, the Emperor wasn't there).  So if you are a Jedi or a Dark 
Jedi depends on how fast you are moving and in what direction multiplied 
by the square of your present position.  In other words, it's really 
complicated to figure out if a Jedi is dark or light.  Basically, what I 
am trying to say with this is that you can't camp in the middle.  There 
is no gray area, a fine line which is easily crossed, but no gray area. 
    I'd like to present another popular solution to "gray-area" 
problem.  Perhaps this just means that he skirts dangerously close to 
the dark side (i.e. Luke scrambling the pilots minds in the Thrawn 
trilogy, or choking the Gammorean guards in ROTJ, which he felt bad 
about), but that he has enormous self control and easily skirts back 
from the line, far into the light side of the spectrum where it is 
harder to be tempted.  Comments? 
    And as for a couple of Gonk's suggestions: 
>Obi-Wan lies to Luke about his father, is the one who makes the fatal 
mistake about Anakin. 
Obi-Wan on the Dark Side because he didn't tell Luke about his father? 
He was protecting him from the Emperor for crying out loud! And as for 
training Anakin, he just made a simple mistake, overestimating himself. 
How is that using the force while in anger, fear, or aggression? 
> Yoda tells Luke to forget about his friends 
Yoda told Luke not to go save his friends, why was it?  Oh yeah, because 
there was a Dark Lord of the Sith, firmly entrenched in the Dark Side, 
ready to tempt Luke to the Dark Side or kill one of his two last hopes. 
He told Luke not to save his friends for the same reason parents tell 
their kids no to drink and drive.  To save them injury or death (or 
falling to the Dark Side (beer is of the Dark Side BTW).  He wasn't 
keeping Luke from saving his friends, he was trying to save Luke's 
friends from seeing Luke turned into a monster. 
>Luke turns to the Dark Side at the very end, albeit temporarily. 
While Luke did look like he was using the Dark Side of the Force at the 
end of the lightsaber battle, as soon as he realized what he was doing, 
he threw away his lightsaber and surrendered rather than be consumed, 
instantly returning to the Light Side of the spectrum. 
>And Vader....Geez, Vader just flip-flops back and forth, doesn't he? 
No debate there, but as I said before, it's possible to quickly move 
back and forth on the spectrum, though every time you do, the Dark Side 
pulls a little harder."
  • MAR 17
Gonk wrote: 
"While Obi-Wan made many overtures about protecting Luke from the knowledge 
that Vader was his Father, I don't really get the details of how this 
supposedly 'protected' him. How would Luke have been in any more danger to 
the Emperor if he had known the man was his father than if not? Perhaps 
there would have been a trepadacious moment when Vader kills Obi-Wan on 
Luke's part, but Ben couldn't have forseen that. 

What Ben not telling Luke about his father seemed to me was Ben just not 
WANTING to tell him that, because it was pretty painful stuff. He just 
told himself he was protecting Luke, but really, I can't see how Luke was 
really protected in any way. 

As for Yoda, his advice to Luke is intended to keep him from the Dark 
Side before his is ready for it, certainly-- but he's doing it at the cost 
of lives. Perhaps Yoda's advice was best, but it comes at a questionable 
cost. To Yoda, sacrificing your friends for the greater good is a viable 
alternative; he does not necessarily prescribe to the view of 'no, take me 
first' because if you're a Jedi, sometimes you have a greater 
responsibility than to your friends. 

If you want to put this into context, think of 'Air Force One' (Solo 
points here) where the President is confronted with sacrificing the lives 
of his family or releasing a man from prison who would likely kill 
millions. If it were Yoda in that situation, he would likely have 
sacrificed his family for all those millions-- but the president in that 
movie doesn't. In some cases, people might look on this as being somewhat 
'dark' or 'inhuman', though. It's a rather gray area by modern 
understandings. 

Qui-Gon Jinn may very well by 'good' and on one side of the line in some 
ways, but be over it in other, more minor ways-- more than say Obi-Wan or 
definately Luke....yet not as much as Anakin is when he becomes Vader (And 
I'm also of the belief that there are worse ways to utilize the Dark Side 
than Vader does in his worst moments, or even the Emperor)."

  • MAR 28
C. Swift wrote: 
"I was reading some of the postings about the role of Qui-Gon Jinn in the prequels and came across one by Christian. He writes: "could Qui-Gon be a Jedi rank? "Qui-Gon" Jinn Skywalker would make lots more sense". This to me, at first, appeared wrong; not the part about Qui-Gon being a Jedi rank, but the fact that he is a Skywalker. I was never a fan of the "Qui-Gon is Anakin's father" rumour. I thought, "Qui-Gon Jinn Skywalker! might as well be Qui-Gon Jinn Kenobi!" Then it struck me how much this wild idea may actually fit into place. 
    Suppose for a moment Qui-Gon is Ben Kenobi's true father, (he is old enough). His wife is dead, and he falls in love with, and marries, Shimi Skywalker, (she may take his name and become Shimi Kenobi, but Anakin will not, he will still remain Anakin Skywalker). This would make Obi-wan Anakins step brother as well as Owen, (if he is actually Obi-wan's brother). The dramatic events of episode one take place and Shimi and Qui-Gon are killed, leaving Anakin, who is only 8 years old, alone with his two step brothers, Obi-wan and Owen. Obi-wan, goes against his brothers judgement and decides to train Anakin in the ways of the force, involving him in the clone wars, (Obi-Wan says in ANH: "he didn't hold with your fathers ideals, he thoughth he should have stayed here and not gotten involved"). At the end of the prequels (in episode 3) Obi-wan has failed, and his step brother Anakin has turned to the dark side. Owen blames him for this but would naturally take care of Luke who will infact be his nephew; Owen will be Luke Skywalkers real Uncle! 
    This theory goes a long way towards solving on major problem I've had with the relationship between Anakin and Obi-wan given their age difference, and would add to the dramatic events in ANH when Obi-wan is cut down by his own step brother! It will account for Obi-wan, perhaps being the guardian of Queen Padme, coming to seek out his father (Qui-Gon) during Naboo's time of need; therefore the first time he meets his step brother Anakin is only 8 years old but is already a great pilot. It also explanes why Owen was willing to take Luke into his home. However it does not solve the "Anakin and Shimi are slaves" problem. 
    I know this seems like a wild idea and is probably full of holes, (e.g. how does Beru fit in, and why did Anakin not stay with Owen instead of going off to help fight the Nimodians), but I would like to know your views on this speculation."
  • MAR 30
Jamie Wire wrote: 
"to C Swift: 
my main problem with your very plausible theory is that we have heard  
various rumours about Ben Kenobi not appearing in the film until half  
way through. It seems, and I'm not saying that this is in any way  
true, that Kenobi isn't on Tatooine, but that doesn't mean he didn't  
come from there in the first place. Did Ewan McGregor go to Tunisia? 
Anyone know?"
Veasna Hem wrote: 
"He could be Ben's(Obi-Wan Kenobi)father,because his Jedi name (Qui Gon  
Yinn) matches his name (OB1 Kenobi) in both Chinese and Japanese."
  • APR 02
Nathaniel Reed wrote: 
"An earlier posting convincingly suggested that 'Obi-Wan' and 'Qui-Gonn' 
may be titles or ranks. If it appears that 'Darth' is a term for the 
Dark Side / the Sith, then why can't the Good Side have a similar 
notation : thus, in time Luke may yet receive a title in line with his 
Jedi brethren.

Also, on the issue of where Obi-Wan, Yoda, Qui-Gonn, and Anakin stand in 
regards to who taught who when, what if Yoda had covered the majority of 
Ben's tutelage pre-ep*1, and becames assigned to Qui-Gonn, who "led a 
band of acolytes around the galaxy" to complete his training, as a 
*knight* and/or on a more popular basis, serving the communities ? 
Obi-Wan officially becomes Anakin's tutor, building upon what Qui-Gonn 
began as no more than 'conversational' advice."